Technical research
Integrating Injury Early Signals into Daily Workflows
- Live
- The model informs triage. Club governance is unchanged and clinical authority remains with the club's own staff.
- Live
- No integration is required to start. A club can work from the portal and a manual cross-check against its own data.
- Live
- The daily routine is designed to take 15 to 20 minutes and to sit inside the existing morning medical or performance meeting.
A risk score that nobody acts on changes nothing. This paper covers the part that decides whether the system is worth having: what a club actually does each morning, who decides, and how anyone can tell whether it is working.
The daily loop
Five steps, designed to take 15 to 20 minutes: triage the players flagged at the top of the distribution, cross-check them against the context only the club holds, decide an action, log the decision and its outcome, and review weekly.
The weekly review is the step most easily dropped and the one that matters most. It is what stops alert volume drifting until staff stop reading it, and it is where thresholds and the action playbook get adjusted to the squad in front of you rather than to an average one.
Three rules
Actions are tiered rather than binary. At the lower tiers, monitoring and small adjustments. In the middle, reduced intensity or modified load. At the top, a flag for review of session and matchday availability.
The default is the lowest-regret action first, escalating only when the club’s own data corroborates the signal. That is the discipline that keeps a false positive cheap.
Every decision is logged with its rationale in a phrase, and its outcome. Not for the paperwork, but because the weekly review has nothing to calibrate against without it.
Who decides
The club does. The model informs the order in which players are reviewed; it does not carry clinical authority and is not designed to. Governance is unchanged: a daily owner prepares the list, the existing morning meeting takes the decisions.
Knowing whether it works
One measure, agreed before starting: average player-week availability, defined using the club’s own existing reporting standards. Compare matched periods against last season rather than raw totals.
Alongside it, three weekly readings that tell you whether the process itself is healthy: how many alerts were raised, how many were acted on, and what was missed.
No integration is required to begin. Integrate later, if it is worth it.
Access this document
Tell us who you are and we will send you the full document.